Author Topic: Foreskins...  (Read 2482 times)

Offline lvprcm

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 78
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Foreskins...
« Reply #15 on: 2020-04-28 16:38:13 »
I like the short foreskins that just barely cover the glans. I associate the long ones and tight ones with youth. It's just my recollections as a kid seeing other boys who had that type.

Offline frencut50

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 14
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Foreskins...
« Reply #16 on: 2020-12-20 01:38:03 »
Moreover, and this responds to another subject that had been discussed on this forum, at that time, I was intrigued by the frenulum which held my foreskin at its base. And I was sure he was going to come off on his own the day I had my first sex ... Maybe it would have happened, I would never know, because I cut him before myself . What I remember is that before my grandfather explained the tying up to me, I had tried to shoot it in my bath several times to try to detach it. What has never succeeded of course
 !

Offline frencut50

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 14
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Foreskins...
« Reply #17 on: 2020-12-20 02:17:44 »
Sorry, but there was an incident and half of my response was gone! Only the end of the message remains in my post. So I rewrite the beginning here :

Regarding the foreskin, I prefer long and loose ones. I think a long foreskin is important in sexuality and in sexual games, and overhangs are very sensual. However, if I prefer a long foreskin, I like that this one is maintained back behind the glans corona permanently for hygienic reasons. It is in my family culture. When I was 13, my grandfather explained to me the importance for better hygiene to have the glans uncovered permanently to avoid humidity and bad odors.

Regarding the frenulum, I have always preferred when it is removed to avoid both possible tears, the pain sometimes reported, and of course to promote the maintenance of the foreskin behind the corona. To also consider the frequent questioning of the frenulum in cases of premature ejaculation.

Personally, I have a long and loose foreskin, with an overhang of 1.5 cm when I'm soft. As I said above, following my grandfather's explanations, very early on I got into the habit of retracting the foreskin. But at first it was difficult due to my long foreskin and the frenulum which I think was a little too short. It is again my grandfather to whom I will entrust this mechanical difficulty. He then explained to me that it would help things to cut the frenulum by practicing the tying up method. What I did then.  Moreover, and this responds to another subject that had been discussed on this forum, at that time, I was intrigued by the frenulum which held my foreskin at its base. And I was sure he was going to come off on his own the day I had my first sex ... Maybe it would have happened, I would never know, because I cut him before myself . What I remember is that before my grandfather explained the tying up to me, I had tried to shoot it in my bath several times to try to detach it. What has never succeeded of course


Offline PermanetlyBareKnob

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 76
  • Karma: +4/-1
Re: Foreskins...
« Reply #18 on: 2020-12-26 07:23:41 »
OK...so, since we are all Covid-19-ified into isolation, I thought that I might start this query.  I'm thinking that the vast majority of guys on PulledBack do not want to lose their foreskins, but do love the exposed glans, for various reasons.  So guys, what kind of foreskins do you like, long ones, very short ones, ones where the glans peeks out when not retracted?  And, if you don't need to get rid of your frenulum for retraction purposes, do you prefer to keep your frenulum, or do you want it gone for cosmetic reasons?  I am very curious to hear beyond 'I just wanna be retracted', what is the main driver of retraction...please add your thoughts, and don't be shy, no one is judging here...

I’m not actually a fan of foreskins, but to the extent that I have a preference, I prefer them short, with some of the glans exposed.

I DEFINITELY want to keep my frenulum.  Mine is quite loose/stretched out, so it doesn’t really put much tension on my foreskin to pull it forward, and it is quite pleasurable.  I also like the look of the frenulum, so I prefer it to remain intact, no matter what the future holds.

As for why I want to be retracted, that’s a long answer that I’ve explored in more detail in other posts.  Probably because I grew up in the US, I have a strong aesthetic preference for a bare glans, and I really prefer how my own penis looks with glans exposed.  And now that I’ve been doing to for so long, I think it just feels better in daily life.  And masturbating without my foreskin is just more pleasurable.

Offline DonFish

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 24
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Foreskins...
« Reply #19 on: 2020-12-26 11:55:17 »
As my foreskin is the only one im really interested in (my wife doesn't have one!) I'd say I like it quite my foreskin long like it is. I jmhave a fair amount of overhang (1 cm or so) and if anything, I'd like there to be some more. 

Offline Lanyx

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 30
  • Karma: +1/-0
Re: Foreskins...
« Reply #20 on: 2020-12-31 11:34:25 »
My preference is for the very short ones, where the glans peeks out when flaccid. I myself have about a 1/4 inch overhang when erect. I remember about 20 years ago trying to keep it pulled back for a long time. I developed an "unsafe" technique of combining two elastic bands which trap the retracted foreskin between them.
Later in life, I began to watch porn, where almost every actor was cut. It simply looks much better. I then came across the spoon method on this site, and here I am a good 6 years later. In a year, I'm about 80% of the time retracted. Some days, I simply couldn't be bothered, others, I correct it if it slips forward. I managed to get mine so loose, that I can use a finger instead of the spoon.