Pulled back — living with a bare head

General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: jdm on 2015-11-03 00:41:40

Title: New method inspired by Halloween!
Post by: jdm on 2015-11-03 00:41:40
I have been preparing some tutorials for how to make some of my favorite retraction aids, so the gears were turning in my head. Those guides will be forthcoming over the next few days or weeks, as time allows. But a brand new method just occurred to me as I was shopping clearance items at one of those Halloween stores. It got me so excited that I just had to share it with you! The method is simple, but may require some trial and error. All you need is some liquid latex, and maybe some Q-tips, makeup sponges and/or rubber gloves. Before you start, here are a few warnings: 1.) Obviously, if you have a latex allergy, this is not for you. 2.) If you've never used liquid latex, be aware that it dose not come out of fabrics, so be careful not to get it on your clothes or carpets or whatever. 3.) You're gonna wanna shave your pubes for this method, as the liquid latex will otherwise make a horrible mess out of them, which could be very unpleasant to deal with. Other than that, you should be good to go!

The method is simple: Pull your foreskin back to the base of your cock, and hold it there while you apply the liquid latex in a daubing motion over the wrinkles that form. This will basically glue the wrinkles together, and keep the foreskin retracted. But unlike glue, liquid latex is very elastic (think latex gloves, or condoms) so the result is very comfortable, and feels really natural. Also, it does not sting at all. The liquid latex dries very quickly, so you can do this in a matter of minutes. I recommend applying several thin layers, allowing each to dry completely before applying the next. If, like me, you're not a professional makeup artist, the results may be unsightly. In my case the whole area looked like it was heavily scared. But for me it's well worth it, because the comfort and feel is amazing! And on the flip side, if you are a professional makeup artist, I have to assume that you could make this look very convincingly like a real, circumcised cock. If I had the time, I'd love to experiment with this, and see how realistic I could make it look.

Much like the double tape method, this method allows for a lot of customization in terms of how tight you want the result to be. I'm not sure how durable the hold will be if you make it really tight, then grow a big stiffy. Your mileage may vary. I've only just begun to experiment with this, so I don't know everything. But I know enough to tell you that it's already one of my favorite methods, and well worth a try!  :D
Title: Re: New method inspired by Halloween!
Post by: soundsgreat87 on 2015-11-03 04:24:50
:O I'd NEVER considered something like this. I'd heard of guys attempting to use various glues, but it never seemed reasonable since glue is inflexible, or irritating, or too weak, or too strong, or whatever. Great idea!
Title: Re: New method inspired by Halloween!
Post by: jdm on 2015-11-03 06:21:35
:O I'd NEVER considered something like this. I'd heard of guys attempting to use various glues, but it never seemed reasonable since glue is inflexible, or irritating, or too weak, or too strong, or whatever. Great idea!

Yeah, I've considered trying some sort of glue in the past, but never found one that I felt comfortable trying. I've used liquid latex for zombie makeup before, but for some reason it never occurred to me to put some on my penis. ::) But I figure it should be safe to use. The Japanese have a glue called "Peel Magic", which is marketed specifically for this purpose, but it isn't readily available in the USA. Here's a link: http://houkei.ukime.org/0000108654.html

While I'm replying, I will give you an update, I've been wearing the liquid latex for about half the day, and it still feels like the most comfortable method I've ever used. I've always liked the double tape method, but it has several drawbacks (pun intended) ;). One is the bulge that results from the skin folding over itself and the inner tape strip. I've never liked that. Additionally, even with the best tape I've been able to find, the outer tape strip is always stiffer than my skin, which winds up pushing the foreskin towards the glans when I'm flaccid. I don't like this either. Then there's the issue of the tape coming off either in the shower, or soon after, because the adhesive gets wet. And if you want to fix this, you pretty much have to start from scratch. By contrast, the liquid latex has no adhesive to breakdown from getting wet. My application survived the shower with just minor pealing at the edges, which did not cause any release of the foreskin. I could have easily touched it up, but I didn't even bother. As for the other problems, the latex can be applied to my desired level of tightness while flaccid, so there isn't any of that pushing forward on the foreskin like with the tape. There is less of a bulge, and it is more uniform, because it is distributed over the entire area of the wrinkles along the shaft.

To be fair, it does have some flaws all its own. For one thing, it does look ugly. There is a reason people use this stuff for zombie makeup. :) Second, it has a rubbery feel. I generally don't even notice this, but if I rub it with my hand, it definitely has that tacky rubber feel. I haven't tried yet, but I expect this may get in the way of certain masturbation techniques. But certainly not all. It remains to be seen how long I can wear it like this before it breaks down. But so far I am very please with this method, primarily because of the comfort, which for me is better than anything else I've tried. I have a few others that I like a lot, and work very well for daytime use. But I always have trouble sleeping with my foreskin retracted because I tend to notice whatever I'm wearing then, and it distracts me from sleep. I've got my fingers crossed about this method, and really hoping it allows me to get through the night without removing it. :D
Title: Re: New method inspired by Halloween!
Post by: soundsgreat87 on 2015-11-03 08:05:19
Fantastic! The only thing I worry about is how the folded skin will hold up without any way to dry out. Hopefully there's no irritation/infection from it.
Title: Re: New method inspired by Halloween!
Post by: jdm on 2015-11-03 10:03:43
Fantastic! The only thing I worry about is how the folded skin will hold up without any way to dry out. Hopefully there's no irritation/infection from it.

I hear you. That's an issue with the tape method as well. Though, guys usually can't go more than a few days without the tape coming off due to the natural secretion of oils and sweat anyway. This may be similar. Frankly it's a problem with the spoon method as well, even though it doesn't involve any foreign devices. The bottom line is, you just have to take a break from whatever you do to wash and dry the area periodically. Personally I like to mix it up, and alternate retraction aids frequently anyway. I think it's healthy and minimizes irritation from any pressure points that might exist.
Title: Re: New method inspired by Halloween!
Post by: jdm on 2015-11-03 21:56:48
So, this morning I woke up with my foreskin still well back behind the glans. The latex had separated a little more around the edges during the night, mostly near the base. This resulted in the skin having migrated forward about 3/4", and pushing against the corona (about like CI-3), where as the sulcus had been completely exposed when I'd first started yesterday afternoon (CI-1). Still a victory in my book, as I had been retracting only during the day time up 'til now. I decided to touch up the latex, which proved difficult, because the point that most needed repair was right at the base, which is the biggest stress point. I managed to restore it a bit, but not as tight as I'd wanted, because it just wouldn't hold adequately, and kept re-separating. I wound up with something like CI-2. To compensate for this, I took up the extra slack from the other end. I prefer to keep most of the bunching near the base so that it feels more free and natural near the head, but I didn't really have a better option this time if I wanted to salvage this application and tighten things up. This did work well, and got me back to a CI-1, while still leaving all of the inner foreskin uncovered. I think the next time it separates or migrates substantially, I will just scrap this application and start over from scratch. I haven't had any irritation at all, but I will probably let the skin rest for a day from the latex, just to be on the safe side; opting instead for a different retraction aid during this period.
Title: Re: New method inspired by Halloween!
Post by: jdm on 2015-11-06 05:46:21
Well, I took a day off from the latex, using my Kumakkey knock-off instead. Now, I've just completed my second application of the latex method, and it came out a lot better the 2nd time around. Just thought I'd update, and share some things I've learned to make it work better. First off, I did it right after drying off from the shower, so the skin was as clean it gets. I think that will help it hold better. Second, I applied a thin coat of latex over the area, and let it dry completely before pulling the skin back tight to form wrinkles. This created a tackier surface that I believe helps the subsequent layers stick better. Heck, after just the first layer, the wrinkles wanted to stick together as soon as I scrunched them up; even before I added any more layers of latex! It wasn't enough to hold, but it was obvious that it helped. Then I applied 2 more layers, waiting a full 5 minutes in between. I applied one final extra layer only at the very base, as this is the greatest stress point. The result looks a lot better. The layers look a lot smoother and much more transparent. I also went slightly looser this time (about CI-1.5). I've got a feeling this will last a lot better than my first try. I'm also encouraged with my success in sleeping while retracted. This will be my 3rd night in a row. I think the fact I'm now able to go 24/7 is really going to accelerate the training process. I'm very curious to see how well the skin will stay back on its own after a week or two of this.  :)
Title: Re: New method inspired by Halloween!
Post by: Teasle on 2015-11-06 08:10:16
i would love to see a photo of that method!
Title: Re: New method inspired by Halloween!
Post by: jdm on 2015-11-06 21:15:47
i would love to see a photo of that method!
I am sorry. I know I'm in the minority on this group, but I just don't feel good about posting pics of my junk online. I will however try to come up with some decent drawings like those that exist for the tape method. It's not the same, but maybe it will be helpful for somebody. :-\
Title: Re: New method inspired by Halloween!
Post by: jdm on 2016-10-19 00:41:37
It's that time of year again, when Halloween stuff, including liquid latex, is readily available in most stores. So I thought I'd revisit this topic and make a little tutorial on how to do this one-eyed monster makeup to disguise your uncut cock as a circumcised one. ;D  It's also a more comfortable alternative to the tape method, so you can enjoy it all year long! ;)
Title: Re: New method inspired by Halloween!
Post by: jdm on 2016-10-19 00:42:59
This last step is optional. :)
Title: Re: New method inspired by Halloween!
Post by: Hazeleye on 2016-10-20 04:56:45
Regarding the use of liquid latex as an aid in keeping the foreskin retracted, I have had experience in this over 60 years ago when I first attempted, only slightly different. What I did was to take a smooth mandrel that is slightly smaller than the flaccid cock with the skin pulled back and place a thin layer of latex all around it for a couple of inches. When dried, roll the thin layer up so it forms a ring like that on a condum. I found that this worked well to keep the skin back. You may have to experiment with the size of the mandrel and the amount of latex to use. Ideally you should allow the latex several days time to properly cure.

The ring is put on the pulled back skin a 1/2 inch or so from the corona. Be aware that as you wear this ring, body moisture/oils, tend to make the ring larger, so use a smaller mandrel than you might originally think. One can wear this ring and no one can even see that you wear it.
Title: Re: New method inspired by Halloween!
Post by: jdm on 2016-10-21 02:18:44
That's very interesting, Hazeleye. I'd sure like to learn more about your method. If you ever do it again, maybe you can post some photos. Or provide illustrations, even if you never do it again. A tutorial would be great to see!

While related, your method seems quite different from the one I've outlined above though, since you are creating a solid latex appliance that you subsequently put on your penis, somewhat like a very thin rubber cock sleeve. Where as my method involves applying the latex, in liquid form, directly onto the penis, more as an adhesive. I think my method is more reminiscent of how the Japanese product know as "Peal Magic" is designed to work. Although, it's hard to say, because I've never been able to find any instructions for how to use it.
Title: Re: New method inspired by Halloween!
Post by: Hazeleye on 2016-10-21 05:20:01
Hi jdm, an artist I'm not, but here is a simple diagram of what I was trying to describe. Essentially what one is trying to create is a simple latex ring that fits over the retracted foreskin that inhibits the skin moving back over the glans. Elsewhere, others have referred to purchasing silicone rings that should do the same thing. In creating your own, you have better control over what you want. When I created my first one, silicone wasn't invented yet!

How do one post
Title: Re: New method inspired by Halloween!
Post by: Hazeleye on 2016-10-21 05:40:20
Question, how does one submit a single file? When I tried just now, it appeared my whole file was submitted, not just the diagram I intended.
Title: Re: New method inspired by Halloween!
Post by: jdm on 2016-10-21 05:43:41

Question, how does one submit a single file? When I tried just now, it appeared my whole file was submitted, not just the diagram I intended.

I'm not sure I understand the problem you are experiencing. Here are some basic step-by-step instructions for uploading attachments.

Under the main text field, there is a link called "Attachments and other options." Click that, and you will be presented with a section designated "Attach:" Under that there will be a button marked "Choose File". Click that, and select the file you wish to upload. If you want to upload more than one file, click on the link marked "(more attachments)". Select each file you wish to upload individually, as a separate attachment. There is a limit of four attachments per post, and a maximum individual file size limit of 1024KB. I hope that helps. If not, please clarify your question.

Looking forward to your diagram. :) 
Title: Re: New method inspired by Halloween!
Post by: Kylar on 2016-10-22 20:36:02
Question, how does one submit a single file? When I tried just now, it appeared my whole file was submitted, not just the diagram I intended.

I'm not sure what you mean, the uploader only every uploads single files, never parts of files.  Just like every other file upload on the web ever :)  Crop the image first and try again.
Title: Re: New method inspired by Halloween!
Post by: Hazeleye on 2016-10-23 05:01:46
JDM, I did do the steps that you gave for attaching a file, exactly. When I clicked on "Attach File" it brought me to "Downloads" in my computer. I then clicked on the file to attach. I then posted the entry. My entire "Download" screen listings showed up in the post, without showing only the illustration file. My "Download " file is of no interest, so I hastily had the post deleted. To post a file, is this normal, and the intended file is attached so that it only will be seen? That was why I was wondering what I did wrong. Or do I have a mean bug in my computer?

Thanks for the advice, JDM.
Title: Re: New method inspired by Halloween!
Post by: soundsgreat87 on 2016-10-23 05:23:01
Quote
My entire "Download" screen listings showed up in the post

...what the heck?

Can you explain that a bit more?
Title: Re: New method inspired by Halloween!
Post by: Aftskin on 2016-10-23 21:14:54
...what the heck?

Can you explain that a bit more?

Yeah I don't see how that is possible. Only one file can go in each each of the four attachment boxes. How can a whole folder of files fit in one attachment as a single file?

Hazeleye, did you check the file name in the attachment box after you selected it? Did your post look like it had a print screen image of your downloads folder? Is that what you mean by screen listings?
Title: Re: New method inspired by Halloween!
Post by: Hazeleye on 2016-10-25 04:44:18
I tried to submit the illustration again. When I am directed to attach a file, I am taken to the Downloads folder of my computer, where icons of files are shown with their identifying lines below. When I transmitted the file with the attachment, instead of the illustration showing up on the screen, at the bottom of the submitted screen was the outlined file name. When you click on that line, the entire set of icons in the Documents folder shows up on the screen instead of the illustration. I fail to see how you will be getting the illustration instead of my entire folder listings.

Weird. I have never posted photos/illustrations here but have had no problem transmitting files from Documents folder through other sites. In Downloads, do you open the file first, then attach? Will try that. No, that didn't work.

Those that transmit photos, etc., when you click on "Choose File" what folder are you directed to for the attachment and in what form -- icon/identify line or the actual photo/illustration? On your computers to attach files are you directed to a different folder than Documents?
 

 
Title: Re: New method inspired by Halloween!
Post by: Kylar on 2016-10-25 18:24:27
When you click the "Browse..." button, a window opens that allows you to select one file, typically the folder that is opened is the last one your browser has been to, which might as well be your Downloads folder.  You then select a file (typically by double-clicking) and the window will close and the file shall appear to be chosen in the attachment thingy next to the "Browse..." button.  Then you press Send and that's when your post and your chosen file will be submitted.  This is also how most websites worked before someone invented a way to accept files by drag & drop.  This old forum engine does not support that.
Title: Re: New method inspired by Halloween!
Post by: Hazeleye on 2016-10-26 04:36:30
When you click the "Browse..." button, a window opens that allows you to select one file, typically the folder that is opened is the last one your browser has been to, which might as well be your Downloads folder.  You then select a file (typically by double-clicking) and the window will close and the file shall appear to be chosen in the attachment thingy next to the "Browse..." button.  Then you press Send and that's when your post and your chosen file will be submitted.

Kyler, when you say "click the 'Browse...' button", I take it you mean "Choose File" under "Attach:". I do so, and that brings me to Downloads folder. Even if I then go back to Documents (which, as you suggest, comes up next when I have just been in it), where the file was first placed and click on that tag line, I get the indication that this file has been chosen. I then press "Post" and my message shows up having been added to the message board with the tag line showing at the bottom to click on and no illustration showing. I then click on the tag line and my entire icons from the Downloads folder then shows up. If you want to see my Downloads folder, I will leave it up instead of deleting. Or is it that you will see my illustration and all I see is my entire Downloads file in the final post?

It would appear to me that I am doing every thing correctly from the very beginning and still getting the same result, no matter.

Bottom line, I give up trying to post any photo/illustration here, since it does not work for me.

Thank you all.
Title: Re: New method inspired by Halloween!
Post by: Aftskin on 2016-10-26 23:23:31
Kyler, when you say "click the 'Browse...' button", I take it you mean "Choose File" under "Attach:". I do so, and that brings me to Downloads folder. Even if I then go back to Documents (which, as you suggest, comes up next when I have just been in it), where the file was first placed and click on that tag line, I get the indication that this file has been chosen. I then press "Post" and my message shows up having been added to the message board with the tag line showing at the bottom to click on and no illustration showing. I then click on the tag line and my entire icons from the Downloads folder then shows up. If you want to see my Downloads folder, I will leave it up instead of deleting. Or is it that you will see my illustration and all I see is my entire Downloads file in the final post?

It would appear to me that I am doing every thing correctly from the very beginning and still getting the same result, no matter.

Bottom line, I give up trying to post any photo/illustration here, since it does not work for me.

Thank you all.

So you are looking at your post and you click on the attached file, and that file name is the one you wanted to be attached, and you then get your downloads folder pop up?
 Sounds to me like your pc is just asking to download a copy of your own file into your downloads folder. No one else would see your downloads folder in this case, they would see their own download folder which they would download your attached file into.
Title: Re: New method inspired by Halloween!
Post by: Hazeleye on 2016-10-27 16:50:44
So you are looking at your post and you click on the attached file, and that file name is the one you wanted to be attached, and you then get your downloads folder pop up?
 Sounds to me like your pc is just asking to download a copy of your own file into your downloads folder. No one else would see your downloads folder in this case, they would see their own download folder which they would download your attached file into.

Aftskin, are you saying while others are showing photos/illustrations directly in their postings that I will be transmitting only the tag line to other pcs for that illustration and they have to open it from their Downloads folder? That they would not be seeing my Downloads file listings, as I do when viewing the final posting. I would think that what you see in final posting is exactly what I see. If that be the case, how are other posters showing photos/illustrations in their postings and I can't?

It could be that my computer has been compromised, and I need to get it in anyway to have it checked out.
Title: Re: New method inspired by Halloween!
Post by: Kylar on 2016-10-27 20:10:58
There's no way we, on this forum, can see your downloads folder (or any other folder), so no worries about that.  It might be what Aftskin says, maybe the image doesn't display but when you click on it (or the placeholder text anyway), your browser attempts to download the file, and provides you with a very similar file dialog as when you try to upload the file.  On Windows (and Firefox, not sure if the browser has any power over this) the title of these two windows is "File upload" and "Enter name of file to save to...", i.e. clearly serving a different purpose.
Title: Re: New method inspired by Halloween!
Post by: Hazeleye on 2016-10-28 03:07:01
For what the illustration is worth, after all that, I will complete the posting on making a latex cock ring. Its just that I was expecting the illustration to be shown like other postings, not just the tag line.

Thanks for the info and patience!
Title: Re: New method inspired by Halloween!
Post by: Aftskin on 2016-10-28 03:43:20
For what the illustration is worth, after all that, I will complete the posting on making a latex cock ring. Its just that I was expecting the illustration to be shown like other postings, not just the tag line.

Thanks for the info and patience!

You're welcome  :)

I downloaded and saw your illustration. It worked fine. The forum here can't display PDF files, that's why it needs to be downloaded to see it.
Title: Re: New method inspired by Halloween!
Post by: jdm on 2016-11-03 03:03:16
Hi, Hazeleye. Sorry I've been absent from this discussion. I would've tried to help, but I've been sick, and not on the site for a while. Thanks to all the others who tried to help. Glad you finally managed to post your picture. It did help me to better understand what you did, and it is different than I'd imagined. I thought you were creating a sort of tube that you would wear to cover your entire shaft, while keeping the skin back. Now I see that you were wearing it rolled up into a ring just behind that glans. It might be interesting to make an appliance like I'd imagined though. Sort of like a bald cap to hide your foreskin instead of your hair! ;D  Another Halloween makeup inspired method! ;)
Title: Re: New method inspired by Halloween!
Post by: Hazeleye on 2016-11-07 05:08:31
JDM, since I sent the diagram about making latex rings, I got to thinking, what with the balloon methods and others on here, why not go a little further. I decided I would try instead of making 1 ring, use a longer core and roll the latex from each end, leaving a tube effect in the middle. I may need to try a larger core so the bands are looser, but with body oils/moisture, the bands do get larger and freer over time. If anyone wants more info on the process, give a shout.
Title: Re: New method inspired by Halloween!
Post by: soundsgreat87 on 2016-11-08 17:52:41
Hey, that seems pretty cool! Could you use a condom with the end cut off  to similar effect?

Oh and... your cock looks amazing ;) what a big head!
Title: Re: New method inspired by Halloween!
Post by: Hazeleye on 2016-11-09 04:27:51
Hey, that seems pretty cool! Could you use a condom with the end cut off  to similar effect?

Oh and... your cock looks amazing ;) what a big head!

No, I am afraid not. Depending on the firmness of the flaccid penis as to the size of the two rings. In my case, the core size was 7/8", much smaller than that of the normal condom. It requires a small size to grip the skin to bunch the skin between the rings to prevent the foreskin folding over the glans. Even then, the skin did slip some from under the experimental device.

Thanks for the compliment soundsgreat87, but part of the enhancement was from the ring size and irritation of the latex. Should have waited past 24 hours for the latex to have properly cured!
Title: Re: New method inspired by Halloween!
Post by: soundsgreat87 on 2016-11-09 15:03:07
Ahh that makes sense. Condoms are made for ERECT cocks, after all!

Is the latex elastic enough to accommodate erections? It just looks like it might cut into the skin.
Title: Re: New method inspired by Halloween!
Post by: jdm on 2016-11-10 03:17:10
It might be fun to try some experiments like this with stretchy silicone instead of latex.
Title: Re: New method inspired by Halloween!
Post by: Hazeleye on 2016-11-10 03:39:16
On an erection the rings that I made would be tight but, being latex, does have give. It was initially made smaller from experience with previous use of latex rings enlarging and softening over time due to body oils/moisture. Of course, through experimentation, one can make the rings as thick as they choose for firmness.

This was a bit of an experiment as to what might be available as an alternative for those that have trouble keeping pulled back.

It might be fun to try some experiments like this with stretchy silicone instead of latex.

JDM, good point, as I said in an earlier post, I am from the older generation, before silicone was available, so latex came to mind first. As I indicated above, thought this technique might be of interest to try.
Title: Re: New method inspired by Halloween!
Post by: jdm on 2016-11-10 04:19:20
Yeah, latex is definitely more accessible, and easier to use. But silicone may be worth the effort.
Title: Re: New method inspired by Halloween!
Post by: jdm on 2016-12-27 16:54:23
Just wanted to add a note here. Although I really like this method, I hate how long you have to wait for the latex to dry between layers. So I came up with a variation. Recently I've been putting less emphasis on the durability of the result and more on speed. What I do is apply just a single layer of latex, wait for it to get tacky, but not fully dry (maybe 2 minutes). Then I pull the skin back to the root of the penis, and keep it like that while it finishes drying (another 2 or 3 minutes). The result is a much faster application. Unfortunately, it's also less durable, so not really practical for masturbation or sex. But for just wearing the skin back during non-sexual activities, it's very comfortable and lasts quite well.
Title: Re: New method inspired by Halloween!
Post by: guest969 on 2017-01-01 11:08:19
Even though my skin tends to stay back unaided I thought I'd give the latex glue method a try.
I found that the moisture between the two layers of foreskin caused the glue to lose its stickiness and disintegrate.
Title: Re: New method inspired by Halloween!
Post by: TapedStick on 2017-01-01 19:54:59
What's a fair price/oz on liquid latex, and how much do you need to buy, jdm? Where can you find this stuff when not halloween?
Title: Re: New method inspired by Halloween!
Post by: jdm on 2017-01-03 02:26:50
Even though my skin tends to stay back unaided I thought I'd give the latex glue method a try.
I found that the moisture between the two layers of foreskin caused the glue to lose its stickiness and disintegrate.
I'm sorry you had this problem. Like all retraction methods, some work better for some people than for others. However, sometimes it also takes some trial and error before you have success with a method. I would note that in the way that I've described this method, there should be no point wherein there is skin-to-skin contact. The shaft skin should be entirely coated by the liquid latex, and so when the wrinkles are formed, there should be latex in between every point of contact between the wrinkles. Moisture could still accumulate between the skin and the latex, I suppose, but I have not experienced this problem when I do it. I've definitely experienced moist hands after wearing rubber gloves for an extended period, so it makes sense that this could happen. I'm not sure why it doesn't happen for me on my penis. Perhaps the liquid latex, when applied directly to the skin, may seal the skin pores, reducing perspiration, like an antiperspirant deodorant. Also, when I think about the moisture which accumulates inside rubber gloves, it seems to me that most of it is condensation, not sweat. Perhaps because the liquid latex is applied directly to the skin of the penis and seals it, with no air gap to encourage condensation, this sort of moisture accumulation can be largely avoided, if done properly. However, bear in mind that the latex won't last forever, no matter what you do. It will eventually detach and come apart. This is also true of tape when using the tape method.
Title: Re: New method inspired by Halloween!
Post by: jdm on 2017-01-03 02:41:08
What's a fair price/oz on liquid latex, and how much do you need to buy, jdm? Where can you find this stuff when not halloween?
You don't need a whole lot for just one application, although I couldn't tell you how many ounces are required. I originally tried it using just a small bottle from a Halloween store. It was probably 1 or 2 oz and cost 5 or 6 bucks. I used some of it for zombie makeup, then used what was left to experiment with retraction. I don't remember how many applications I got out of that small bottle, but it was several. Since then, because I like to use this method with some regularity, I have taken to buying larger, 16 oz bottles, which sell for around 10 bucks. You can buy them at most Halloween shops, and Walmarts during Halloween season. Other times of the year you can buy them online from various sources. I get them from Amazon. I've tried several brands, and they all seem to work about the same, so I tend to buy whatever is cheapest. Here's a link to the last one I ordered. https://www.amazon.com/Liquid-Latex-16-Fluid-Ounces/dp/B004WCMKA0/ref=sr_1_3_a_it?ie=UTF8&qid=1483410509&sr=8-3&keywords=liquid+latex
Title: Re: New method inspired by Halloween!
Post by: TapedStick on 2017-10-02 22:33:50
So it is Halloween season yet again. Anybody want to share any liquid latex finds and the prices you paid for them and where?
Title: Re: New method inspired by Halloween!
Post by: Terminal3k on 2018-09-17 10:34:38
Just a thought, could this liquid latex work like the first part of the spoon method? Use the spoon method, but then use the latex to hold it in place? Then it won't look so bad?
Title: Re: New method inspired by Halloween!
Post by: jdm on 2019-01-06 09:32:00
Just a thought, could this liquid latex work like the first part of the spoon method? Use the spoon method, but then use the latex to hold it in place? Then it won't look so bad?
Worth a try. I've never had much luck with the spoon method. But for those of you who use it, let me know your experience.