Poll
Question:
Do you prefer pulling your foreskin just at the corona or behind it
Option 1: Just at the corona (Foreskin in touch with the corona)
votes: 39
Option 2: Behind the corona (Foreskin not in touch with the corona)
votes: 92
Sometimes my foreskin may be at the corona after shrinkage or when the weather gets cold
It kind of bothers me as I prefer exposing my glans completely.
That is great. I like to keep mine as far back as possible. Love playing with the inner foreskin to.
I always pull mine tight and work up and down so my hand just hits the corona.
I voted for behind as my preference but, as a grower, there is a difference between that and what actually tends to happen. When flaccid and cold there is a tendency for my foreskin, whether just pulled back or using the spoon method, to creep over the glans. My options to prevent this have included no underwear, this provides a little friction and a sense of 'naughtiness' that promotes a semi, or wearing tight briefs that hold everything in place.
I'm not sure this is a choice many people can make, is it? If the skin is just pulled back, it will naturally rest immediately behind the corona and touching it, unless the frenulum is removed.
Behind the corona, as that's the exact reason I always prefer wearing a glans ring. My foreskin always touches the corona otherwise and I feel like personally it's not worth pulling back if I can't fully expose the glans.
for most people, the glans is "designed" to stop the foreskin from rolling over if it is large enough, and the foreskin would be in contact with the corona, unless the foreskin is tight enough to stay pulled further back (given enough time, it will eventually loosen up and still touch the corona, frenulum or not)..
then again, i've used plastic buttons to keep the foreskin pulled back (not touching the corona), and when lazy i've also just allowed the foreskin to sit wherever it naturally stops rolling over the glans, and found that when the foreskin does touch the corona, smegma (the whitish stuff) starts to accumulate in the coronal ridge after a while..
of course, self-care by pulling the foreskin all the way back and washing the glans, the coronal ridge, and inside my exposed urethra (i have a partial subincision, and a deep reverse PA, so it makes this very easy to do), is what i do whenever a bidet is available to me.. and simply dabbing dry the end of the unexposed end of my urethra is what i do when i'm in a public toilet without a bidet..
Quote from: burtonian on 2023-09-17 10:10:24
I voted for behind as my preference but, as a grower, there is a difference between that and what actually tends to happen. When flaccid and cold there is a tendency for my foreskin, whether just pulled back or using the spoon method, to creep over the glans. My options to prevent this have included no underwear, this provides a little friction and a sense of 'naughtiness' that promotes a semi, or wearing tight briefs that hold everything in place.
Very interesting idea!
I've been part-time freeballing 2-3 years and go full-time for 5 years
And never thought this would help my foreskin stay away from the corona ridge.
I love having direct contact on the corona so I find if the foreskin is pulled behind it, it feels the best
Quote from: HCheung on 2023-09-17 06:21:15
Sometimes my foreskin may be at the corona after shrinkage or when the weather gets cold
It kind of bothers me as I prefer exposing my glans completely.
Do you mean that when there is cold weather, sometimes your foreskin partially covers your glans?
This happens to me sometimes when I use loose underwear, and yikes! I adjust it back the first opportunity I get. It feels so wrong.
Quote from: Nivek on 2023-09-20 10:21:08
Do you mean that when there is cold weather, sometimes your foreskin partially covers your glans?
This happens to me sometimes when I use loose underwear, and yikes! I adjust it back the first opportunity I get. It feels so wrong.
Not exactly covering my glans, but just at the corona
And Im hoping to achieve the state of no foreskin touching my glans, not even the corona at all
Ahh, ok... good luck with it!
I'm a grower so I've got lots of loose skin and it's bunching, so it's impossible for me to be able to have foreskin not touching the corona at all.
Although I can't always achieve it, my preference is to have my glans, corona, and sulcus fully exposed, and my inner foreskin too. I think it just looks and feels nicer that way. Just pulling back or using the spoon method, my foreskin tends to rest right up against the back of my corona. But if I use the tape method, the position of my foreskin is a lot more variable, sometimes covering my corona, sometimes resting behind my corona, and sometimes leaving my sulcus exposed, depending on how flaccid I am.
My foreskin when retracted sits behind the glands. My coronal ridge is prominent and can keep it held in position, even when sitting.
I also prefer my foreskin completely clear from my corona
I prefer it back to a point where the inner foreskin is exposed.
I'd prefer my inner foreskin to be as exposed as possible, but the way things are setup right now, it's often sitting just at the corona. So not really a choice I'm making but the reality of my current state
IMO, I prefer the foreskin to sit resting on the coronal rim. Somehow I feel it puts weight on the rim of the glans causing it to flare more and sense it while I walk. All the guys that I've observed including my dads, have their foreskin resting on the corona. I actually like the look as it exemplifies a bulbous flared glans for me.
I've seen a few uncut guys who really, really have a short foreskin and the foreskin portion that makes up the preputial opening sit further back behind the rim when their flaccid. As they get fully erect, the foreskin is pretty stretched out leaving the inner foreskin fully exposed. They almost look like they were circumcised without the notable dark ring scar to the untrained eye. I was fortunate enough to encounter such a person and he told me about himself and his experience getting there. If you care to look at his videos he's on reddit as r/mruniverse17. He has one particular video on redGif that shows how far back his foreskin rests and how it never touches his glans. I like it! Wished I could have gotten there, but those guys are pretty rare. I think some may describe him as having a case of aposthia, someone born without a foreskin however he says he was born with a foreskin and remembers it well. He got there through his puberty growth according to him. He does also have a good size penis even in its flaccid state.
Just thought I'd share.
My foreskin just touches the corona if I just have it pulled back without using the spoon method. Which it is more than happy to do.
Quite useful for keeping it exposed, which helps with sensitivity.
When I do use the spoon method, like when I head to the beach or the likes. The foreskin isn't then in contact with the corona.
Quote from: lvprcm on 2023-11-11 19:58:39
I've seen a few uncut guys who really, really have a short foreskin and the foreskin portion that makes up the preputial opening sit further back behind the rim when their flaccid. As they get fully erect, the foreskin is pretty stretched out leaving the inner foreskin fully exposed. They almost look like they were circumcised without the notable dark ring scar to the untrained eye. I was fortunate enough to encounter such a person and he told me about himself and his experience getting there. If you care to look at his videos he's on reddit as r/mruniverse17. He has one particular video on redGif that shows how far back his foreskin rests and how it never touches his glans. I like it! Wished I could have gotten there, but those guys are pretty rare. I think some may describe him as having a case of aposthia, someone born without a foreskin however he says he was born with a foreskin and remembers it well. He got there through his puberty growth according to him. He does also have a good size penis even in its flaccid state.
Very interesting, I had a friend who showed me his penis once and I thought his foreskin was really short, but nothing like that guy. If you hadn't said so, I would have thought for sure he was cut. Even his softer pictures look cut.
I've always wanted my skin as far back and as tightly back as possible. When I first started retracting my foreskin bunched close to my corona. After 20 years of permanent retraction it stayed somewhat further back. My circumcision ensured the tightness that I sought. My scar is a little way back from my corona and permanently visible to anyone wanting to see it.