I felt like a thread collecting encounters with autocircumcision on the web might be interesting, similar to the Pulled-back-on-TV thread here (http://pulledback.org/index.php?topic=84.0 (http://pulledback.org/index.php?topic=84.0)).
I was prompted to do so, because recently I stumbled upon Undie Guy, a guy on vimeo reviewing men's underwear, and in one of his more recent videos (https://vimeo.com/176932977 (https://vimeo.com/176932977)) he was explicitly admitting to pulling back and addressing his reasons:
[A]nd a lot of you guys asked me, aha, whether I'm cut or uncut, so I ... there's my foreskin, and as you can see I am uncut, but I usually pull it back, ehm, s— because it tends to look a little bit better, ehm, that way, especially when I'm wearing, uhm, wearing underwear, and, well, just generally looks sexier [...]. [6:50min]
Culturally/socially/sexually interesting, I'd say. Thought some of you might appreciate that.
(http://i.imgur.com/vSX3cXa.jpg)
http://imgur.com/a/gzPRj (http://imgur.com/a/gzPRj)
(http://i.imgur.com/V3c2G5r.png)
http://imgur.com/a/BVkzZ (http://imgur.com/a/BVkzZ)
Great video, yes people like the look so i skin back...
Hello. The pulled back look great on you. I like it that's why i do it to. keep it up.
I think it has to do perhaps with a flared head being especially pronounced when one is pulled back. The coronal ridge of the glans is visible when wearing certain underwear pulled back. In his vid, the pair with the slightly baggy "pouch" seems made to show off a glans ridge of a cut guy (or a pulled back guy, as we clearly saw). I personally think his dick looks awesome both skin forward and skin back, but that particular big pouch seems to be designed to conform to the ridge of a bare glans and might as well be saying "hey, look at my big head". Do you guys concur?
I know this is an old thread but I found this on another site:
https://www.lpsg.com/threads/skinned-back-softies.544728/