Its been well documented that men who have been circumcised since birth, usually end up with a much smaller urethra opening as adults compared to uncut guys.
Kinda curious if any of you have noticed any change on your urethra after days-weeks-months-years of pulling back!
Like this: https://www.google.no/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjcg-z12L_TAhVEXBoKHcDGDxkQjRwIBw&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.quora.com%2FAfter-urinating-some-drops-of-urine-remain-inside-I-put-a-pressure-to-bring-them-outside-Im-very-tensed-What-should-I-do&psig=AFQjCNFvTxR9RMjBKr9CUic0wSwxFgv3Rw&ust=1493212693971292
Hi, i haven't noticed a size difference, that's interesting to know though. I keep pulled back 24/7 and everything is tge same apart from a more flared head.
Well no change for me, think i started keeping it back most of the time since 1995, and mine is still the same..
I'm not too familiar with this phenomenon, but I have a suspicion that this may have something to do with the presence or absence of a frenulum to pull on the meatus. Perhaps if the frenulum is removed, and does not pull on the meatus, it might constrict a bit, lengthwise. I'll be curious to read others' thoughts on this.
Interesting, the frenulum idea is very logical, probably what happens if you ask me.
No, i have not noticed but i will check this out
I think there is no difference at all. Maybe just the meatus changed a little little bit aftet I started retracting but the whole glans and skin changed so it is absolutely normal ;)
Yes, it might have an effect but I think mine more to do with 'old age'. I have started sounding to stretch the urethra a bit, so not takes ages to complete a pee :-\